Decision on Page and Time Limits for the 'No Case to Answer' Motion

ICC-01/09-01/11-1970

18 septembre 2015 | Chambre de première instance V(a) | Décision

Affaire: Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
Situation: Situation en République du Kenya

Classé au cours de la Procès phase

Télécharger

Document: Anglais (398.6 Ko | 10 Pages)


Documents Connexes

10 septembre 2015, Ruto Defence application for extension of time limit to submit a ‘no case to answer’ motion (220.08 Ko | 7 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1959 | Defence: Ruto

13 septembre 2015, Sang Defence Response to Ruto Defence application for extension of time limit to submit a ‘no case to answer’ motion (634.31 Ko | 4 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1960 | Defence: Sang

13 septembre 2015, Prosecution’s consolidated response to the joint Defence request for extension of time limit to submit a “no case to answer” motion (142.23 Ko | 6 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1962 | Bureau du Procureur

14 septembre 2015, Sang Defence Second Request for Reconsideration of Page Limit (465.79 Ko | 5 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1963 | Defence: Sang

15 septembre 2015, Ruto Defence Request to Join the “Sang Defence Second Request for Reconsideration of Page Limit” (449.21 Ko | 4 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1964 | Defence: Ruto

15 septembre 2015, Prosecution’s response to Sang Defence second request for reconsideration of page limit (185.46 Ko | 8 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1965 | Bureau du Procureur

15 septembre 2015, Common Legal Representative for Victims’ Reply to the Ruto Defence Application for Extension of Time Limit to Submit a ‘no case to answer’ Motion (224.6 Ko | 4 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1966 | Legal Representatives of Victims

6 novembre 2015, Scheduling Order for Oral Hearings on the Defence 'No Case to Answer' Motions (70.87 Ko | 3 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1999 | Trial Chamber V(a)